Comparisons of Hepatobiliary Phase Imaging Using Combinations of Parallel Imaging and Variable Degrees of Compressed Sensing With Use of Parallel Imaging Alone

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to compare the image quality in the hepatobiliary phase images of gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging using parallel imaging (PI) and compressed sensing (CS) reconstruction, using variable CS factors with the standard method using the PI technique.

Methods: In this study, 64 patients who underwent gadoxetic acid-enhanced liver magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0 T were enrolled. Hepatobiliary phase images were acquired 6 times using liver acquisition with volume acceleration (LAVA) and CS reconstruction with 5 CS factors 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, and 2.5 (LAVA-CS 1.4, 1.6, 1.8, 2.0, and 2.5) and standard LAVA (LAVA-noCS). For objective analysis, the signal intensity ratios (SIRs) of the liver-to-spleen (SIR liver/spleen ), liver-to-portal vein (SIR liver/portal vein ), and liver-to-fat (SIR liver/fat ) were estimated. For subjective analysis, 2 radiologists independently evaluated the quality of all the images.

Results: The objective analysis demonstrated no significant difference in all evaluation parameters of all the images. Subjective analysis revealed that the scores of all evaluation items were higher for LAVA-noCS images than for LAVA-CS images, and only LAVA-CS 1.4 did not significantly differ from LAVA-noCS in all evaluation items ( P = 1.00 in 2 readers).

Conclusions: A CS factor of 1.4 in the hepatobiliary phase image with combined PI and CS can reduce the scan time without degrading the image quality compared with the standard method.