Background: Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) often mimics heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Due to very different treatment strategies, an exact diagnosis and differentiation between pure HFpEF and CA-related heart failure (HF) is important. In the present study, we assessed the recently published H<inf>2</inf>FPEF score in patients with pure HFpEF, transthyretin (ATTR), as well as light chain (AL) amyloidosis-related HFpEF and tested whether it differentiates between these entities.
Methods: The H<inf>2</inf>FPEF scores consists of easy-to-assess clinical (Body Mass Index, number of hypertensive drugs, presence of atrial fibrillation, age) and echocardiographic (systolic pulmonary arterial pressure, E/E´) parameters. It can be computed in a categorical way resulting in scores between 0 and 9 points (0-1: HFpEF rule out, 2-5: further testing required, 6-9: HFpEF rule in), or in a continual way providing an exact percentage of a patient's HFpEF probability. Continuous and categorical variables were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney-U, and χ2-tests. Diagnostic accuracy was computed from 2x2 tables. Survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier curves. A P value of <0.05 was set as the level of significance.
Results: A total of 100 patients with pure HFpEF, 53 patients with ATTR, and 34 patients with AL CA were included in the present study. Median age (HFpEF: 71.5 years; ATTR CA: 77.0 years; AL CA: 60.0 years; P<0.001), gender distribution (HFpEF [female]: 73.0%, ATTR (female): 18.9%, AL [female]: 38.2%; P<0.001), and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide (HFpEF: 1045pg/mL; ATTR CA: 1927pg/mL; AL CA: 4308pg/mL; P<0.001) differed significantly between study cohorts. Median H<inf>2</inf>FPEF scores were highest among HFpEF (categorical: 5.0 points; continual: 95.1%), followed by ATTR (categorical: 4.0 points; continual: 89.0%), and AL CA (categorical: 3.0 points; continual: 31.2%). Respective P values were <0.001. Low H<inf>2</inf>FPEF scores (0-1 points) were found among patients in the AL CA cohort (29.4%), but not among HFpEF or ATTR CA patients (P<0.001). The majority of patients, irrespective of disease entity were in the intermediate score range (2-5 points, HFpEF: 80.0% ATTR CA: 94.3%, AL CA: 67.9%; P=0.006). High scores (6-9 points) were most often found among HFpEF patients (20.0%), followed by ATTR CA (5.7%) and AL CA (2.9%), (P=0.007).
Conclusions: The H<inf>2</inf>FPEF score should be used with caution, as there is a significant overlap between HFpEF and CA-related HF.