Recently, the question of whether cancer risk is only accelerated but not increased by radiation exposure has been raised. To explore this matter, we analyzed whether the cumulative mortality of irradiated mice could be explained by x-axis (age) shifted cumulative mortality of nonirradiated mice. We reanalyzed publicly available data on observed cumulative mortality or prevalence in irradiated female B6C3F1 mice that lived their entire lifespan. The results showed that the irradiated curve was well matched to uniformly shifted nonirradiated curve for the cumulative mortality of all causes of death but not for the cumulative mortality of all solid tumors and prevalence of ovarian tumors as is. After adjusting lifetime mortalities, it was also well matched for all solid and ovarian tumors. The shifted days by irradiation were 71-116 days for all causes of death, 56-135 days for all solid tumors, and 41-140 days for ovarian tumors in the 1.9 Gy-irradiated group. The response was switched between irradiation at 35 and 105 days consistently for all the above indexes, supporting the hypothesis that radiation sensitivity differs between juvenile and adults. The shifted days of all causes of death showed a tendency of linear response to dose. This concept of shifting the age of death can be applied not only for all cause of death but also for mortality of all solid tumors after adjusting the magnitude. These findings contribute to the discussion on the application of the 'shifting age of death' concept to radiation protection.
Keywords: all-cause mortality; irradiation; mice maintained for life; ovarian tumor; shifting age of death; tumor-related mortality.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.