Purpose: To understand the current utilisation of the clinical framework for delivery of health services to manage compensable musculoskeletal injuries from the perspectives of insurer case managers and clinical panel members.
Materials and methods: Using a qualitative descriptive approach, 15 semi-structured interviews were conducted with members of key organisations including WorkSafe Victoria and Transport Accident Commission Victoria. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis.
Results: Four over-arching themes were identified: (i) current use of the framework and principles is suboptimal leading to several problems including lack of evidence-based treatment by clinicians; (ii) barriers to optimal use of the framework include lack of adequate training of healthcare professionals on the framework principles and financial aspects of the compensation system; (iii) utilisation of the framework could be improved with training from peak associations, insurers, and regulating bodies; and (iv) optimal use of the framework will result in better health and work outcomes.
Conclusions: The current use of the framework and its principles is suboptimal but can be improved by addressing the identified barriers.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONRehabilitation of compensable musculoskeletal injuries is often complex.Implementing the "Clinical Framework for Delivery of Health Services" can lead to provision of time and cost effective, evidence-based rehabilitation for compensable injuries, ultimately improving patient outcomes.Clinicians can enhance the implementation of the framework principles by integrating evidence-based practice and recommendations from clinical practice guidelines in treatment of compensable musculoskeletal injuries.Implementation of the framework principles may be enhanced by reviewing the compensation funding model to allow the healthcare practitioners adequate time and remuneration to adopt the framework principles when treating persons with compensable injuries.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal injuries; compensable injuries; evidence-based practice; implementation; insurers and regulators.