Background: Endodontic failure is due to the persistence of microorganisms, especially Enterococcus faecalis, which have become resistant to disinfection measures. Sodium hypochlorite has been traditionally used, whereas phytic acid, a natural irrigant, needs to be further investigated.
Methods: This ex-vivo study compared the antibacterial effectiveness of 0.9% saline solution, 5% sodium hypochlorite and 5% phytic acid against Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 29212 into the apical root canal third of 96 single-rooted extracted teeth, after 1-minute push-and-pull irrigation - a basic irrigation technique. Survived microorganisms were evaluated both through a traditional colony-forming-unit count and introducing the viability PCR, which precisely detects only DNA from intact cells: dead and damaged cells were excluded thanks to a propidium monoazide dye.
Results: The culture methods showed that 5% sodium hypochlorite (median: 0 CFU/mL) has a significant greater antibacterial effectiveness (P<0.001) compared both to 0.9% saline solution (median: 4.76 CFU/mL) and 5% phytic acid (median: 0.25 CFU/mL). However, 5% phytic acid proved to be significantly more effective (P<0.001) than 0.9% saline solution. The viability PCR did not reveal a significant difference between 5% sodium hypochlorite (median: 4.12×104 survived bacteria) and 0.9% saline solution (median: 8.45×104 survived bacteria). Five percent phytic acid (median: 0.83×104 survived bacteria) was significantly more effective than both 0.9% saline solution (P<0.001) and 5% sodium hypochlorite (P<0.001).
Conclusions: The findings suggest that 5% phytic acid works against root canal bacteria even with a basic irrigation technique and viability PCR seems to lead to more reliable and sensitive data rather than the culture methods.