Background: People would prefer to have psychotherapy as treatment over medication for major depression. There is evidence that psychotherapy does not require in-person delivery to be effective. Other modes of delivery, such as videoconferencing teletherapy, may make it a more accessible treatment.
Method: The aim of this review was to identify the characteristics of effective psychotherapy delivered by videoconference for adults in primary care with a primary diagnosis of depression. A quantitative systematic review was conducted and reported according to PRISMA guidelines.
Results: There were 8 studies included in the review. The therapies studied were tele problem-solving therapy, behavioural activation and cognitive behavioural therapy. All studies had a medium to high risk of bias. Six were randomized controlled trials, one was a pragmatic retrospective cohort study and one was an open-label design. Four studies found similar outcomes to the in-person comparators, one study found tele problem-solving therapy was more effective than behavioural activation, and one study found cognitive behavioural therapy to be similar to usual care.
Limitations: The search identified only 8 studies. Due to the heterogeneity of outcome measures and comparators, a meta-analysis could not be conducted.
Conclusions: No definitive conclusions can be drawn about the effectiveness of teletherapy in primary care based on this review, however, there is emerging evidence to suggest it has similar outcomes to in-person therapy for people with a primary diagnosis of depression. There is no evidence regarding the superiority of one model of therapy over the others.
Keywords: Depression; Psychotherapy; Systematic review; Teletherapy; Videoconferencing.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.