The acute effects of cannabis with and without cannabidiol in adults and adolescents: A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover experiment

Addiction. 2023 Jul;118(7):1282-1294. doi: 10.1111/add.16154. Epub 2023 Feb 26.

Abstract

Background and aims: Long-term harms of cannabis may be exacerbated in adolescence, but little is known about the acute effects of cannabis in adolescents. We aimed to (i) compare the acute effects of cannabis in adolescent and adult cannabis users and (ii) determine if cannabidiol (CBD) acutely modulates the effects of delta-9-tetrahydocannabinol (THC).

Design: Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover experiment. The experiment was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04851392).

Setting: Laboratory in London, United Kingdom.

Participants: Twenty-four adolescents (12 women, 16- to 17-year-olds) and 24 adults (12 women, 26- to 29-year-olds) who used cannabis 0.5-3 days/week and were matched on cannabis use frequency (mean = 1.5 days/week).

Intervention: We administered three weight-adjusted vaporised cannabis flower preparations: 'THC' (8 mg THC for 75 kg person); 'THC + CBD' (8 mg THC and 24 mg CBD for 75 kg person); and 'PLA' (matched placebo).

Measurements: Primary outcomes were (i) subjective 'feel drug effect'; (ii) verbal episodic memory (delayed prose recall); and (iii) psychotomimetic effect (Psychotomimetic States Inventory).

Findings: Compared with 'PLA', 'THC' and 'THC + CBD' significantly (P < 0.001) increased 'feel drug effect' (mean difference [MD] = 6.3, 95% CI = 5.3-7.2; MD = 6.8, 95% CI = 6.0-7.7), impaired verbal episodic memory (MD = -2.7, 95% CI = -4.1 to -1.4; MD = -2.9, 95% CI = -4.1 to -1.7) and increased psychotomimetic effects (MD = 7.8, 95% CI = 2.8-12.7; MD = 10.8, 95% CI = 6.2-15.4). There was no evidence that adolescents differed from adults in their responses to cannabis (interaction P ≥ 0.4). Bayesian analyses supported equivalent effects of cannabis in adolescents and adults (Bayes factor [BF01 ] >3). There was no evidence that CBD significantly modulated the acute effects of THC.

Conclusions: Adolescent cannabis users are neither more resilient nor more vulnerable than adult cannabis users to the acute psychotomimetic, verbal memory-impairing or subjective effects of cannabis. Furthermore, in adolescents and adults, vaporised cannabidiol does not mitigate the acute harms caused by delta-9-tetrahydocannabinol.

Keywords: CBD; THC; adolescence; cannabis; cognition; memory; psychosis; subjective drug effects.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Bayes Theorem
  • Cannabidiol*
  • Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists
  • Cannabis*
  • Cross-Over Studies
  • Double-Blind Method
  • Dronabinol
  • Female
  • Hallucinogens*
  • Humans
  • Marijuana Smoking*

Substances

  • Cannabidiol
  • Dronabinol
  • Hallucinogens
  • Cannabinoid Receptor Agonists

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04851392