Purpose: To understand the methodological quality of recent guidelines for laparoscopic surgery and endoscopic management for colon cancer and to analyze the heterogeneity and possible reasons for the main recommendations.
Methods: A systematic and comprehensive search of databases and relevant websites was conducted to collect guidelines for laparoscopic surgery for colon cancer in the last 10 years that met the inclusion criteria. The AGREE II manual was used to evaluate the included guidelines and to assess and analyze the heterogeneity and reasons for key recommendations about the surgery.
Results: A total of fifteen guidelines were included in this study. Only two guidelines had an overall score greater than 60% and were recommended for clinical use. Eleven guidelines had an overall score of 30-60%, and two guidelines had an overall score of less than 30%. Further analysis of the reasons for heterogeneity in the guideline recommendations and evidence was performed for nine guidelines. This study found that only 36.1% of the evidence levels recommended in the guidelines were high. Significant heterogeneity exists in the main recommendations, mainly because the relevant content is not mentioned or described in detail.
Conclusion: The quality of guidelines for laparoscopic colon cancer surgery is variable, and there is significant heterogeneity among key recommendations. And the level of evidence underlying the recommendations was generally not high. Further guideline updates should address the causes of the above heterogeneity.
Keywords: Colon cancer; Endoscopic management; Guidelines; Laparoscopic surgery; Systematic evaluation.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.