Thulium fiber laser in endourology: current clinical evidence

Curr Opin Urol. 2023 Mar 1;33(2):95-107. doi: 10.1097/MOU.0000000000001057. Epub 2022 Oct 21.

Abstract

Purpose of review: To review and summarize preclinical and clinical data on thulium fiber laser's (TFL) effectiveness (ablation rate, stone-free rate etc.) and safety in terms of laser injuries and thermal damage. This enables us to assess how the in-vitro evidence translates into the clinical real-life scenario.

Recent findings: In this analysis, a total of 21 preclinical trials have been included. Most of the trials use conventional Holmium:YAG laser as a comparator, with only a few assessing lasers with pulse modulation. Most of the trials focus on the superior ablation rate and superior dusting features of TFL, as well as comparison of retropulsion (both in conventional Ho:YAG and in a pulse modulation), with a few studies assessing safety aspects. A total of 13 trials assessed TFL, clinically, in percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) and retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS). The clinical data obtained suggest that lithotripsy by TFL is safe, facilitates effective stone fragmentation, and results in a reduction of retropulsion. Unfortunately, most of the clinical trials lack a direct comparator, and so no clear-cut comparisons are possible.

Summary: During in-vitro studies, TFL demonstrated to be a new energy source with a great potential for improved ablation, lower retropulsion and improved dusting. These claims are supported in contemporary clinical studies, reporting superior ablation and negligible retropulsion in both PCNL and RIRS. However, it should be noted that the data regarding clinical results compared with conventional Ho:YAG is still limited.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Humans
  • Lasers, Solid-State* / adverse effects
  • Lithotripsy*
  • Lithotripsy, Laser* / adverse effects
  • Lithotripsy, Laser* / methods
  • Nephrolithotomy, Percutaneous*
  • Thulium

Substances

  • Thulium