Local conditions matter: Minimal and variable effects of soil disturbance on microbial communities and functions in European vineyards

PLoS One. 2023 Jan 27;18(1):e0280516. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280516. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Soil tillage or herbicide applications are commonly used in agriculture for weed control. These measures may also represent a disturbance for soil microbial communities and their functions. However, the generality of response patterns of microbial communities and functions to disturbance have rarely been studied at large geographical scales. We investigated how a soil disturbance gradient (low, intermediate, high), realized by either tillage or herbicide application, affects diversity and composition of soil bacterial and fungal communities as well as soil functions in vineyards across five European countries. Microbial alpha-diversity metrics responded to soil disturbance sporadically, but inconsistently across countries. Increasing soil disturbance changed soil microbial community composition at the European level. However, the effects of soil disturbance on the variation of microbial communities were smaller compared to the effects of location and soil covariates. Microbial respiration was consistently impaired by soil disturbance, while effects on decomposition of organic substrates were inconsistent and showed positive and negative responses depending on the respective country. Therefore, we conclude that it is difficult to extrapolate results from one locality to others because microbial communities and environmental conditions vary strongly over larger geographical scales.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Farms
  • Herbicides* / pharmacology
  • Microbiota*
  • Soil / chemistry
  • Soil Microbiology

Substances

  • Soil
  • Herbicides

Associated data

  • Dryad/10.5061/dryad.n8pk0p30k

Grants and funding

Results presented here are part of the PromESSinG project, funded by the 2013-2014 BiodivERsA/FACCE JPI joint call for research proposals. With the national funders Ilona Leyer received funding from the Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF, Germany, https://www.bmbf.de, grant number 01LC1405A), Bordeaux Sciences Agro received funding from Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR, France, https://anr.fr/, ANR-14-EBID-0004), Marius Skolka received funding from the Romanian National Authority for Scientific Research and Innovation (Romania, https://uefiscdi.gov.ro/, CCCDI – UEFISCDI, Romania, project number PN3-P3-61 contract 21/2015, within PNCDI III), Astrid Forneck received Funding from Austrian Science Fund (FWF, Austria, https://www.fwf.ac.at/de/, project number I 2053-B25) and Sven Bacher received funding from the Swiss National Science Foundation (SNSF, Switzerland, https://www.snf.ch/de, project number 40FA40_158390). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.