No changes in the abundance of selected fecal bacteria during increased carbohydrates consumption period associated with the racing season in amateur road cyclists

PeerJ. 2023 Jan 20:11:e14594. doi: 10.7717/peerj.14594. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

Background: Cyclists often use high-carbohydrate, low-fiber diets to optimize the glycogen stores and to avoid the gastrointestinal distress during both, the trainings and the competitions. The impact of such dietary changes on gut microbiota is not fully known.

Methods: We assessed the abundances of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii, Akkermansia muciniphila, Bifidobacterium spp., and Bacteroides spp. and the fecal pH in 14 amateur cyclists during the racing season. Eleven healthy men formed the control group.

Results: Despite significant differences in the diet composition and physical endurance levels of amateur cyclists before the competition season (1st term) and control group (carbohydrates: 52.2% ± 4.9% vs 41.9% ± 6.6%; VO2max: 56.1 ± 6.0 vs 39.7 ± 7.7; p < 0.01; respectively), we did not observe any significant differences in studied gut bacteria abundances or fecal pH between the groups. Although the cyclists' carbohydrates consumption (2nd term) have increased throughout the season (4.48 g/kg b.w. ± 1.56 vs 5.18 g/kg b.w. ± 1.99; p < 0.05), the studied gut bacteria counts and fecal pH remained unchanged. It seems that the amateur cyclists' diet with increased carbohydrates intake does not alter the gut microbiota, but further research is needed to assess the potential impact of even higher carbohydrates consumption (over 6 g/kg b.w.).

Keywords: Carbohydrates; Cycling; Exercise; Gut microbiota; Nutrition.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Athletes*
  • Carbohydrates
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Physical Endurance*
  • Seasons
  • Verrucomicrobia

Substances

  • Carbohydrates

Grants and funding

This research was funded by a grant “Development of young researchers” obtained from the Poznan University of Physical Education. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.