This single-centre prospective feasibility study (UMIN000030232) evaluated whether zinc supplementation was safe and effective for improving outcomes among patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Within 24 h after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention, consenting patients with AMI were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive conventional treatment (conventional treatment group) or conventional treatment plus zinc acetate supplementation (zinc supplementation group). The two groups were compared in terms of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), and scar size, which was evaluated using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) at 4 weeks after discharge. A total of 56 patients underwent randomization (with 26 assigned to the zinc supplementation group and 27 to the conventional treatment group). The two groups had generally similar laboratory findings and clinical characteristics. The two groups also had similar lengths of hospital stay and rates of MACE. Forty of the 53 patients underwent CMR and it revealed that % core zone was numerically lower in the zinc supplementation group than in the conventional treatment group (9.3 ± 6.9% vs. 14.2 ± 9.1%, P = 0.07). This small single-centre study failed to detect a significant reduction in mid-term MACE after AMI among patients who received zinc supplementation.
Keywords: Major adverse cardiovascular events; Myocardial infarction; Zinc supplementation.
© 2023. Springer Nature Japan KK, part of Springer Nature.