Relevance of sward structure and forage nutrient contents in explaining methane emissions from grazing beef cattle and sheep

Abstract

Forage nutrient contents are an important factor explaining the dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), and methane emissions (CH₄) of ruminants fed indoors. However, for grazing animals, the forage nutrient contents might be limited in explaining such response variables. We aimed to verify the explanatory power of forage nutrient contents and sward structure on daily intake, performance, and CH₄ emissions by sheep and beef cattle grazing different grassland types in southern Brazil. We analyzed data from five grazing trials using sheep and beef cattle grazing on Italian ryegrass (Lolium multiflorum), mixed Italian ryegrass and black oat (Lolium multiflorum + Avena strigosa), pearl millet (Pennisetum americanum), and multispecies native grassland. We used mixed models, including the forage nutrient contents [crude protein (CP), neutral detergent fiber (NDF), and acid detergent fiber (ADF)], sward structure (sward height and herbage mass) and their interactions, as fixed effects and trial, season, methodologies, animal species, grassland type, and paddock, as random effects. The model for DMI (kg DM/LW^0.75) had an adjusted coefficient of determination (R²_adj) of 71.6 %, where 11.3, 23.1, and 37.2 % of the R²_adj were explained by the forage nutrient contents, sward structure, and their interaction, respectively. The ADG (kg/LW^0.75) model presented an R²_adj of 74.2 %, with 12.5 % explained by forage nutrient contents, 29.3 % by sward structure, and 32.4 % by their interaction. The daily CH₄ emission (g/LW^0.75) model had a lower adjusted coefficient of determination (R²_adj = 47.6 %), with 16.8 % explained by forage nutrient contents and 30.8 % explained by sward structure, but no effect of the interaction. Our results show that in grazing ecosystems, the forage nutrient contents explain a small fraction, and the greater explanatory power for DMI, ADG, and CH₄ emissions models is related to sward structure descriptors, such as sward height and herbage mass. Moreover, the interaction between these variables explains most of the variation. In conclusion, forage nutrient contents and sward structure have different influences on DMI, ADG, and CH₄ emissions by grazing ruminants. Because of its relevance to daily CH₄ emissions, offering an optimal sward structure to grazing animals is a major climate-smart strategy to improve animal production and mitigate CH₄ emissions in pastoral ecosystems.

Keywords: Forage chemical composition; Grasslands; Livestock; Pastoral ecosystems; Sward height.