Management of bone loss due to endocrine therapy during cancer treatment

Osteoporos Int. 2023 Apr;34(4):671-680. doi: 10.1007/s00198-023-06672-3. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

Abstract

Bone modifying agents BMAs (oral and IV bisphosphonates, denosumab) are used to treat bone loss due to endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor positive (HR +) early breast cancer and non-metastatic prostate cancer (NMPC). Timely initiation of appropriate sequential therapy is imperative to reduce cancer treatment-induced bone loss (CTIBL). This narrative review summarizes current literature regarding management of CTIBL in HR + early breast cancer and NMPC patients. Risk factors for fragility fractures, screening strategies, optimal timing for the treatment, dosing/duration of therapy, and post treatment monitoring have not been clearly defined in HR + early breast and NMPC patients receiving endocrine therapy. This review aims to discuss the utility of fracture risk assessment (FRAX) tool for the prevention and management of CTIBL, osteoanabolic therapy for imminent fracture risk reduction, and sequential therapy options. Using predefined terms, PubMed, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar were searched for studies on CTIBL in HR + breast and NMPC patients. We included randomized clinical trials, meta-analysis, evidence-based reviews, observational studies, and clinical practice guidelines. Fracture risk assessment tools (FRAX) guide therapy for osteoporosis in patients with early HR + breast cancer and NMPC. BMAs to prevent bone loss should be initiated at higher T-score than recommended by FRAX in premenopausal HR + breast cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced ovarian failure, oophorectomy and gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) therapy, post-menopausal women with HR + breast cancer receiving aromatase inhibitor therapy, and NMPC patients with androgen deprivation therapy. Sequential therapy with osteoanabolic agents as first line treatment offers a potential therapeutic strategy in patients with high imminent fracture risk. Due to limited data in cancer patients regarding management of osteoporosis, a dosing schedule similar to osteoporosis is considered appropriate. Risk stratification to identify vulnerable patient population, choosing the appropriate sequential therapy, and close monitoring of patients at the risk of bone loss can potentially reduce the mortality, morbidity, and health care cost related to CTIBL.

Keywords: Androgen deprivation therapy; Aromatase inhibitors; Bone health in cancer; Cancer treatment–induced bone loss; Osteoporosis; Skeletal health in cancer.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Androgen Antagonists / adverse effects
  • Bone Density
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents* / adverse effects
  • Breast Neoplasms* / drug therapy
  • Diphosphonates / therapeutic use
  • Fractures, Bone* / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Osteoporosis* / chemically induced
  • Osteoporosis* / drug therapy
  • Osteoporosis* / prevention & control
  • Prostatic Neoplasms* / drug therapy

Substances

  • Androgen Antagonists
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents
  • Diphosphonates