Medical Students' Learning About Other Professions Using an Interprofessional Virtual Patient While Remotely Connected With a Study Group: Mixed Methods Study

Carrie Tran; Eva Toth-Pal; Solvig Ekblad; Uno Fors; Helena Salminen

doi:10.2196/38599

Medical Students' Learning About Other Professions Using an Interprofessional Virtual Patient While Remotely Connected With a Study Group: Mixed Methods Study

JMIR Med Educ. 2023 Jan 17:9:e38599. doi: 10.2196/38599.

Authors

Carrie Tran¹, Eva Toth-Pal^{1

2}, Solvig Ekblad^{2

3}, Uno Fors⁴, Helena Salminen^{1

2}

Affiliations

¹ Division of Family Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
² Academic Primary Healthcare Centre, Region Stockholm, Stockholm, Sweden.
³ Cultural Medicine, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
⁴ Department of Computer and Systems Sciences, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.

PMID: 36649071
PMCID: PMC9890351
DOI: 10.2196/38599

Abstract

Background: Collaboration with other professions is essential in health care education to prepare students for future clinical teamwork. However, health care education still struggles to incorporate interprofessional education. Distance learning and virtual patients (VPs) may be useful additional methods to increase students' possibilities for interprofessional learning.

Objective: This study had two aims. The first was to assess if an interprofessional VP case could facilitate medical students' learning about team collaboration in online groups. The second was to assess how students experienced learning with the VP when remotely connected with their group.

Methods: A mixed methods design was used. The VP case was a 73-year-old man who needed help from different health professions in his home after a hip fracture. Questionnaires were answered by the students before and directly after each session. Qualitative group interviews were performed with each group of students directly after the VP sessions, and the interviews were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.

Results: A total of 49 third-year medical students divided into 15 groups participated in the study. Each group had 2 to 5 students who worked together with the interprofessional VP without a teacher's guidance. In the analysis of the group interviews, a single theme was identified: the interprofessional VP promoted student interaction and gave insight into team collaboration. Two categories were found: (1) the structure of the VP facilitated students' learning and (2) students perceived the collaboration in their remotely connected groups as functioning well and being effective. The results from the questionnaires showed that the students had gained insights into the roles and competencies of other health care professions.

Conclusions: This study demonstrates that an interprofessional VP enabled insights into team collaboration and increased understanding of other professions among student groups comprising only medical students. The interprofessional VP seemed to benefit students' learning in an online, remote-learning context. Although our VP was not used as an interprofessional student activity according to the common definition of interprofessional education, the results imply that it still contributed to students' interprofessional learning.

Keywords: distance learning; interprofessional learning; medical education; medical students; remote learning; virtual patient.

©Carrie Tran, Eva Toth-Pal, Solvig Ekblad, Uno Fors, Helena Salminen. Originally published in JMIR Medical Education (https://mededu.jmir.org), 17.01.2023.