Efficacy and safety of ciprofol vs. propofol for the induction and maintenance of general anaesthesia: A multicentre, single-blind, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 clinical trial

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2023 Jun 1;40(6):399-406. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000001799. Epub 2023 Jan 19.

Abstract

Background: HSK3486 (ciprofol) is a 2,6-disubstituted phenol derivative that acts like propofol as an agonist at the gamma-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA A ) receptor.

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of HSK3486 for general anaesthesia induction and maintenance.

Design: A single-blinded, randomised, parallel-group, phase 3 trial.

Setting: Involving 10 study centres, from November 24, 2020 to January 25, 2021.

Patients: A total of 129 patients undergoing nonemergency, noncardiothoracic, and nonneurosurgical elective surgery.

Intervention: Patients were randomly assigned at a 2:1 ratio into HSK3486 or propofol groups, to receive HSK3486 (0.4 mg kg -1 ) or propofol (2.0 mg kg -1 ) for induction before a maintenance infusion at initial rates of 0.8 and 5.0 mg kg -1 h -1 , and were adjusted to maintain a bispectral index (BIS) of 40-60 until the end of surgery.

Main outcome measures: Noninferiority between the drugs was evaluated as the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the between-group difference in the success rate of anesthetic maintenance (primary outcome) >-8%. Secondary outcomes included successful anaesthetic induction, full alertness and spontaneous breathing recovery, time until leaving the postanaesthesia care unit and changes in BIS. Safety profiles were also measured.

Results: Of 129 enrolled patients, 128 completed the trial, with 86 in the HSK3486 group and 42 in the propofol group. The success rate for the maintenance of general anaesthesia was 100% for both groups, and noninferiority of HSK3486 was confirmed (95% CI -4.28% to 8.38%). No significant differences were found between the two groups of patients with regard to secondary outcomes (all P > 0.05). There appeared to be a comparable incidence of treatment for emergency adverse events (TEAEs) (80.2% vs. 81.0%, P = 1.000) and drug-related TEAEs (57.0% vs. 64.3%, P = 0.451) in the HSK3486 and propofol groups.

Conclusion: HSK3486 had a noninferior efficacy profile compared to propofol, exhibiting excellent tolerance.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov, identifier: NCT04511728.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial
  • Multicenter Study
  • Clinical Trial, Phase III

MeSH terms

  • Anesthesia, General / adverse effects
  • Anesthetics*
  • Anesthetics, Intravenous / adverse effects
  • Elective Surgical Procedures
  • Humans
  • Propofol* / adverse effects
  • Single-Blind Method

Substances

  • Propofol
  • Anesthetics
  • Anesthetics, Intravenous

Associated data

  • ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT04511728