Musculoskeletal disorders risk assessment methods: a scoping review from a sex perspective

Ergonomics. 2023 Dec;66(12):1892-1908. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2023.2168767. Epub 2023 Jan 20.

Abstract

The evidence points to differences in the impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) in males and females due to different exposure to risk factors and inherent characteristics. To identify risks associated with MSDs, ergonomic assessment is carried out by applying various methods. The aim of this scoping review was to determine to what extent ergonomic assessment methods consider sex-related factors and if they were found to do so, to determine the extent of this consideration. A total of 31 papers on 32 ergonomic assessment methods were analysed in the review. Of these 32 methods, only 6 considered sex as an assessment parameter or when interpreting the results. The results revealed that the limited consideration given to the sex factor in ergonomic methods, together with the different impacts of MSDs and their consequences according to a person's sex, supports the importance of including sex factors in ergonomic assessment methods. Practitioner summary: This scoping review determined to what extent ergonomic assessment methods consider sex-related factors and if they do so, to establish the extent of such consideration. Of the 32 methods analysed, only 6 considered a person's sex. The results revealed that only a limited consideration is given to the sex factor in ergonomic methods.

Keywords: Musculoskeletal disorders; ergonomic assessment methods; ergonomics; sex perspective.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Ergonomics / methods
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases* / epidemiology
  • Musculoskeletal Diseases* / etiology
  • Occupational Diseases* / etiology
  • Risk Assessment / methods
  • Risk Factors