Geography, ecology, and history synergistically shape across-range genetic variation in a calanoid copepod endemic to the north-eastern Oriental

Abstract

The center-periphery hypothesis (CPH) predicts that peripheral populations will have lower genetic variation than those at the center of a species' distribution. However, ecological margins do not always coincide with geographical edges when topographies are diverse. Historical climate changes can also strongly affect genetic variation. Here, we examined genetic variation in Phyllodiaptomus tunguidus, a calanoid copepod endemic to the north-eastern Oriental. This species was predicted to exhibit a complex pattern of genetic variation across its range due to the diverse topographies and stable climate history of the north-eastern Oriental. To test this, we used geographic distance to the center of the distribution, current ecological suitability, and climate during the last glacial maximum as geographical, ecological, and historical factors, respectively, in our analyses. We measured genetic diversity and population differentiation using mitochondrial and nuclear markers. This showed that P. tunguidus had 3 refugia during the last glacial maximum (LGM). Such a pattern of multiple refugia complicates the determination of the center and periphery of spatial genetic diversity. Both regression models and redundancy analyses failed to support the CPH. Instead, they showed that geographical, ecological, and historical factors together shaped population genetic structure in this species. Ecological factors explained significantly more genetic variation than did geographical and historical factors-however, all three factors interacted significantly to affect the pattern of genetic variation. The results extend our understanding of the CPH and the extent to which it can explain genetic variation across populations.

Keywords: Calanoida; center-periphery hypothesis; ecological niche modeling; genetic diversity; refugium.