This article shows how different drilling strategies may affect the geometrical and dimensional accuracy of deep through holes. The tests were conducted on a three-axis direct-drive turning center. The holes were drilled in cylindrical PA6 aluminum alloy specimens 30 mm in length and 30 mm in diameter using 6 mm Ø VHM HPC TiAlN-coated twist drill bits. The cutting fluid was supplied to the cutting zone through the spindle. The experiments involved applying three strategies to drill deep through (5D) holes. The first required the workpiece to be fixed and the tool to perform both rotary and reciprocating motions. The second assumed that the workpiece performed the primary (rotary) motion whereas the tool moved in reciprocating motion. In the third strategy, the workpiece and the tool rotated in opposite directions and the tool also performed a reciprocating motion. The straightness, roundness, cylindricity, and diameter errors were the key output parameters in the analysis of the geometrical and dimensional accuracy of holes. The Taguchi orthogonal array design of experiment (DOE) was employed to determine the effects of the input (cutting) parameters (i.e., spindle speed and feed per revolution) and the type of hole making strategy on the hole errors by means of multi-factor statistical analysis ANOVA. The use of the highest spindle speed (n = 4775 rpm), the highest feed per revolution (fn = 0.14 mm/rev) and strategy I resulted in the lowest values of the output parameters (STR = 22.7 µm, RON = 8.6 µm, CYL = 28.2 µm, and DE = 9.9 µm). Strategy I was reported to be the most effective for hole drilling in PA6 aluminum alloy because, irrespective of the values of the process parameters used, three out of four output parameters, i.e., straightness, roundness and diameter errors, reached the lowest values.
Keywords: ANOVA; drilling; drilling strategy; hole quality; universal turning center.