Rationale and objectives: To compare the accuracy of preoperative contrast-enhanced cone beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and MRI in assessment of residual tumor after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).
Materials and methods: Residual tumor assessments in 91 female patients were performed on preoperative CE-CBBCT and MRI images after NAC. The agreements of tumor size between imaging and pathology were tested by Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC). Subgroup analyses were set according to ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), calcifications and molecular subtypes. Correlated-samples Wilcoxon Signed-rank test was used to analyze the difference between imaging and pathology in total and subgroups. AUC, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV were calculated to compare the performance of CE-CBBCT and MRI in predicting pathological complete response (pCR).
Results: Comparing with pathology, the agreement on CE-CBBCT was good (ICC = 0.64, 95% CI, 0.35-0.78), whereas on MRI was moderate (ICC = 0.59, 95% CI, 0.36-0.77), and overestimation on CE-CBBCT was less than that on MRI (median (interquartile range, IQR): 0.24 [0.00, 1.31] cm vs. 0.67 [0.00, 1.81] cm; p = 0.000). In subgroup analysis, CE-CBBCT showed superior accuracy than MRI when residual DCIS (p = 0.000) and calcifications (p = 0.000) contained, as well as luminal A (p = 0.043) and luminal B (p = 0.009) breast cancer. CE-CBBCT and MRI performed comparable in predicting pCR, AUCs were 0.749 and 0.733 respectively (p > 0.05).
Conclusion: CE-CBBCT showed superior accuracy in assessment of residual tumor compared with MRI, especially when residual DCIS or calcifications contained and luminal subtype. The performance of preoperative CE-CBBCT in predicting pCR was comparable to MRI. CE-CBBCT could be an alternative method used for preoperative assessment after NAC.
Keywords: Breast cancer; Cone beam breast CT; MRI; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Residual tumor.
Copyright © 2022 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.