Descriptive analysis of emergency medical services 72-hour repeat patient encounters in a single, Urban Agency

Abstract

Introduction: Emergency department unscheduled return visits within 72-h of discharge, called a "bounceback", have been used as a metric of quality of care. We hypothesize that specific demographics and dispositions may be associated with Emergency Medical Services (EMS) 72-h bouncebacks.

Methods: For all patient encounters within one calendar year from a large, urban EMS agency, we recorded demographics (name, date of birth, race, gender), primary impression, disposition, and vital signs for EMS encounters. A bounceback was defined as a patient, identified by matching first name, last name and date of birth, with more than one EMS encounter within 72 h. We performed descriptive statistics for patients that did and did not have a subsequent bounceback using median (interquartile range) and Wilcoxon Rank Sum test for age and frequency (percent) and chi square test for gender, race and run disposition. For patients with a bounceback, we describe the frequency and percentage of EMS professional primary impressions on initial encounter.

Results: 98,043 encounters from January 1, 2021 to December 31, 2021, were analyzed. The median age was 50 years (IQR 32-65); 49.4% (46,147) were female and 50.7% (47,376) were White patients. 3951 encounters had a subsequent bounceback, and compared to those without bouncebacks, they were more often male patients (58.7% versus 50.2%, p < 0.001) and more commonly not transported (22.3% versus 15.5%, p < 0.001). A multivariable logistic regression model estimated the odds of bounceback were lower for females [OR 0.64 (95% CI 0.61-0.68)], Asian and Latino patients compared to White patients [OR 0.33 (95% CI 0.21-0.53) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.34-0.51)], respectively, no significant difference for Black patients compared to White patients, and higher for non-transported patients [OR 1.25 (95% CI 1.16-1.34)]. The The most common EMS primary impression for initial and subsequent encounters was mental health [576 (14.7%) and 944 (17.0%), respectively]. For subsequent encounters, the primary impression was cardiac arrest or death in 67 (1.2%) of cases.

Conclusion: Bouncebacks were common in this single year study of a high-volume urban EMS agency. Male and non-transported patients most often experienced bouncebacks. The most common primary impression for encounters with bounceback was mental health related. Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest occurred in 1 % of bounceback cases. Further study is necessary to understand the effect on patient-centered outcomes.

Keywords: Bouncebacks; Emergency medical services; Prehospital medicine; Unscheduled return visits.