The global leadership initiative on malnutrition criteria for the diagnosis of malnutrition in patients admitted to the intensive care unit: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Clin Nutr. 2023 Feb;42(2):182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.12.007. Epub 2022 Dec 16.

Abstract

Background: Malnutrition is associated with a high risk of morbidity and mortality in patients with critical illness. The nutrition status of patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) is challenging to assess. The Global Leadership Initiative on Malnutrition (GLIM) is a novel framework used for the diagnosis of malnutrition. However, its efficacy in patients with critical illness in the ICU has not been validated.

Aim: To investigate the use and validity of the GLIM criteria in adult patients admitted to the ICU.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed, and seven databases were searched for relevant studies. The selection criteria included studies that used the GLIM in adult patients admitted to the ICU. Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool.

Results: Five studies were included in the analysis. Approximately 15%-68% of patients were diagnosed with malnutrition using the GLIM criteria. Meanwhile, 48%-75% of patients with malnutrition were identified with the Subjective Global Assessment (SGA). The inflammation criterion was easily adjudicated due to critical status, and three studies compared the GLIM and the SGA. According to the QUADAS-2 tool, the nutritional assessment process was not explicit in the studies. The meta-analysis had an overall sensitivity of 65.3% (95% CI: 34.9%-86.9%) and an overall specificity of 88.8% (95% CI: 58.1%-97.8%). In the prospective validation, malnutrition assessed by the GLIM criteria, and the SGA was associated with mortality. However, the association between length of hospital stay and mechanical ventilation was unclear.

Conclusions: The use and validity of the GLIM criteria among patients admitted to the ICU is still limited. Moreover, some concurrent and predictive validation studies have methodological limitations. Further studies must be performed to validate the use of the GLIM criteria in the ICU.

Keywords: GLIM; ICU; Malnutrition; Meta-analysis; Systematic review; Validation.

Publication types

  • Meta-Analysis
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Critical Illness*
  • Hospitalization
  • Humans
  • Intensive Care Units
  • Leadership
  • Malnutrition* / diagnosis
  • Nutrition Assessment
  • Nutritional Status