Background: Salvage transplant has been historically considered effective therapy for myeloma patients relapsing after first transplant, if they achieved adequate remission duration. However, the efficacy of novel agent combinations has called this paradigm into question.
Materials and methods: We performed a retrospective analysis in a homogeneously treated cohort of 106 patients undergoing ASCT2 at our institution, all of whom received novel agent-based chemotherapy (immunomodulatory agent [IMiD] and/or proteasome inhibitor [PI]) for both induction and relapse. As an exploratory objective we assessed whether predictive thresholds of progression free survival post first transplant (ASCT1) for benefit post ASCT2 vary with use of IMiD maintenance post ASCT1.
Results: The overall response rate (ORR) was 98% post-ASCT2 and treatment-related mortality (TRM) was low at 1.8%. With a median follow-up of 26 months (range 0.5-85) from ASCT2, median overall survival (OS) is estimated at 80 months (95% CI: ≥ 49-months) and median progression-free survival after ASCT2 (PFS2) at 24 months (95% CI 19-39). PFS post first transplant (PFS1) at >/= 50 months was associated with improved OS. Predictors of PFS2 included PFS1 ≤42 months and progression on IMiD-based maintenance post- ASCT1.
Conclusion: ASCT2 continues to offer acceptable outcomes for most patients treated within modern day treatment paradigms, with longer PFS after ASCT1 and IMiD non-refractory disease being associated with improved outcomes.
Keywords: Autologous stem cell transplant; IMiD refractory; Multiple Myeloma; Novel agent induction/ maintenance; Salvage transplant.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.