Infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 on Inanimate Surfaces: Don't Trust Ct Value

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 19;19(24):17074. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192417074.

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 RNA is frequently identified in patient rooms and it was speculated that the viral load quantified by PCR might correlate with infectivity of surfaces. To evaluate Ct values for the prediction of infectivity, we investigated contaminated surfaces and Ct-value changes after disinfection. Viral RNA was detected on 37 of 143 investigated surfaces of an ICU. However, virus isolation failed for surfaces with a high viral RNA load. Also, SARS-CoV-2 could not be cultivated from surfaces artificially contaminated with patient specimens. In order to evaluate the significance of Ct values more precisely, we used surrogate enveloped bacteriophage Φ6. A strong reduction in Φ6 was achieved by three different disinfection methods. Despite a strong reduction in viability almost no change in the Ct values was observed for UV-C and alcoholic surface disinfectant. Disinfection using ozone resulted in a lack of Φ6 recovery as well as a detectable shift in Ct values indicating strong degradation of the viral RNA. The observed lack of significant effects on the detectable viral RNA after effective disinfection suggest that quantitative PCR is not suitable for predicting the infectivity of SARS-CoV-2 on inanimate surfaces. Ct values should therefore not be considered as markers for infectivity in this context.

Keywords: Ct value; SARS-CoV-2; disinfection; quantitative PCR; surface contamination.

MeSH terms

  • COVID-19*
  • Disinfection
  • Humans
  • Patients' Rooms
  • RNA, Viral / genetics
  • SARS-CoV-2* / genetics
  • Trust

Substances

  • RNA, Viral

Grants and funding

This research received no external funding.