Metabolic Profiling of Chestnut Shell (Castanea crenata) Cultivars Using UPLC-QTOF-MS and Their Antioxidant Capacity

Biomolecules. 2022 Dec 1;12(12):1797. doi: 10.3390/biom12121797.

Abstract

The inner shell of the chestnut (Castanea crenata) has long been used in Asia as a medicinal herb for improving digestion and blood circulation, and treating diarrhea. However, most chestnut shells are now treated as waste materials in industrial peeling processes. In this study, we examined the metabolite variation among major cultivars of C. crenata shells using mass spectrometry. Among five representative cultivars, Okkwang, Porotan, and Ishizuuchi had higher levels of bioactive compounds, such as ellagic acid derivatives, ellagitannins, flavonoids, and gallic acid derivatives. Their antioxidant capacity was positively correlated with their chemical composition. The byproducts (whole shells) from the industrial peeling process were re-evaluated in comparison with the inner shell, a rich source of phenolic compounds. The phenolic acids and flavonoid glucoside derivatives were significantly higher in the whole shells, whereas the levels of flavonoids were higher in the inner shells. In addition, the whole shell extracts significantly reduced cellular reactive oxygen species production compared to the inner shell extracts. This study demonstrated the different biochemical benefits of different C. crenata cultivars through metabolic profiling and suggests that the whole shell could be used as a functional ingredient, as it has the highest levels of bioactive products and antioxidant effects.

Keywords: Castanea crenata cultivar; antioxidant capacity; chestnut shell; mass spectrometry; metabolic profiling.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Antioxidants* / chemistry
  • Fagaceae* / chemistry
  • Flavonoids / chemistry
  • Nuts / chemistry
  • Phenols / analysis
  • Plant Extracts / chemistry

Substances

  • Antioxidants
  • Plant Extracts
  • Phenols
  • Flavonoids

Grants and funding

This study was funded by ‘R&D Program for Forest Science Technology (Project No. 2020207B10-2222-BA01)’ provided by Korea Forest Service (Korea Forestry Promotion Institute).