Handling of Germline Findings in Clinical Comprehensive Cancer Genomic Profiling

Acta Med Okayama. 2022 Dec;76(6):673-678. doi: 10.18926/AMO/64117.

Abstract

Patients found to have presumed germline pathogenic variants (PGPVs) during comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) require genetic counseling (GC) referrals. We retrospectively investigated the outcomes of patients with PGPVs. Among 159 patients who underwent CGP, we recommended GC for the 16 patients with PGPVs (3 with [FG group] and 13 without [G Group] a family/personal history of hereditary cancer) as well as for the 8 patients with no PGPVs, but a history (F group); 2 (67%), 5 (38%), and 3 (38%) patients received GC in the FG, G, and F groups, respectively. Germline testing results were positive in 1 and 2 patients of the FG and G groups, respectively. Among the patients recommended for GC, 58% did not receive GC due to lack of interest, poor performance status, or death. CGP contributes to the identification of germline variants in patients without a history of hereditary cancer. However, the proportion of patients who undergo GC should be improved.

Keywords: comprehensive genomic profiling; genetic counseling; germline findings; hereditary cancer; presumed germline pathogenic variant(s).

MeSH terms

  • Genetic Predisposition to Disease*
  • Genomics / methods
  • Germ-Line Mutation
  • Humans
  • Neoplasms* / genetics
  • Retrospective Studies