Comparison of genotyping by sequencing procedures to determine population genetic structure

Funct Integr Genomics. 2022 Dec 20;23(1):9. doi: 10.1007/s10142-022-00929-6.

Abstract

Advancements in technology over the past few decades have resulted in the development of genome sequencing at lower costs. Protocols, costs, and the amount of data produced by different sequencing technologies are highly variable. Ion Torrent and Illumina sequencing instruments are two sequencing technologies which use very similar library preparation procedures. Enzymatic combinations can be changed in genotyping by sequencing (GbS) library protocols without significant adjustments. To compare the outputs from two different GbS procedures, we sequenced samples of two sister species of yellow-nosed albatross collected at multiple geographic locations. The data sets involving different sequencing instruments and enzymatic combinations were analysed using the Stacks pipeline and aligned to the same reference genome. Both procedures identified the same genetic clusters separating Atlantic and Indian yellow-nosed albatross and substructure within Indian yellow-nosed albatross.

Keywords: Illumina NovaSeq; Ion Torrent Proton; Paired-end; Restriction enzyme; Single-end.

MeSH terms

  • Chromosome Mapping / methods
  • Genetics, Population
  • Genome*
  • Genotype
  • Genotyping Techniques* / methods
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing / methods
  • Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide