Serrated polyp detection rate in colonoscopies performed by gastrointestinal fellows

Matthew Heckroth; Michael Eiswerth; Mohamed Elmasry; Khushboo Gala; Wenjing Cai; Scott Diamond; Amal Shine; David Liu; Nanlong Liu; Sudaraka Tholkage; Maiying Kong; Dipendra Parajuli

doi:10.1177/26317745221136775

Serrated polyp detection rate in colonoscopies performed by gastrointestinal fellows

Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc. 2022 Dec 12:15:26317745221136775. doi: 10.1177/26317745221136775. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.

Authors

Affiliations

¹ Department of Internal Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
² Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
³ School of Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
⁴ Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY, USA.
⁵ Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Louisville, 550 S Jackson St, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.

Abstract

Background: Clinically significant serrated polyp detection rate (CSSDR) and proximal serrated polyp detection rate (PSDR) have been suggested as the potential quality benchmarks for colonoscopy (CSSDR = 7% and PSDR = 11%) in comparison to the established benchmark adenoma detection rate (ADR). Another emerging milestone is the detection rate of lateral spreading lesions (LSLs).

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate CSSDR, PSDR, ADR, and LSL detection rates among gastrointestinal (GI) fellows performing a colonoscopy. A secondary aim was to evaluate patient factors associated with the detection rates of these lesions.

Design and methods: A retrospective review of 799 colonoscopy reports was performed. GI fellow details, demographic data, and pathology found on colonoscopy were collected. Multiple logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with CSSDR, PSDR, ADR, and LSL detection rates. A p value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: For our patient population, the median age was 58 years; 396 (49.8%) were male and 386 (48.6%) were African American. The 15 GI fellows ranged from first (F1), second (F2), or third (F3) year of training. We found an overall CSSDR of 4.4%, PSDR of 10.5%, ADR of 42.1%, and LSL detection rate of 3.2%. Female gender was associated with CSSDR, while only age was associated with PSDR. GI fellow level of training was associated with LSL detection rate, with the odds of detecting them expected to be four times higher in F2/F3s than F1s.

Conclusion: Although GI fellows demonstrated an above-recommended ADR and nearly reached target PSDR, they failed to achieve target CSSDR. Future studies investigating a benchmark for LSL detection rate are needed to quantify if GI fellows are detecting these lesions at adequate rates.

Keywords: adenoma; colonoscopy; fellow; polyp; serrated.