Background: According to the JCOG0802 study, there were many non-cancer-related deaths in the lobectomy group. Meanwhile, the median age of the enrolled patients in the JCOG0802 study was 67 years old. Whether this difference in perioperative outcomes and survival outcomes is related to age remains unknown. We aim to investigate whether the sublobectomy was comparable to lobectomy in elderly (≥ 75 years old) patients with peripheral solid-dominant [50% ≤ consolidation tumor ratio (CTR) ≤ 1] and diameter ≤ 2 cm non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Methods: We retrospectively included 10,830 patients who underwent surgery treatment at two large-volume medical centers, Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province and Shanghai Chest Hospital, from January 2016 to January 2018. Of these, 164 patients aged ≥ 75 years, tumor ≤ 2 cm, and 50% ≤ CTR ≤ 1 who received lobectomy or sublobectomy were included in our study. The perioperative outcomes, survival analyses, analysis of death patterns, tumor recurrence patterns, and Cox regression analyses were performed.
Results: On perioperative outcomes, sublobectomy was associated with a shorter operation time (p < 0.001), and in terms of survival outcomes, the 5-year overall survival (OS, p = 0.85) and 5-year disease-free surivial (DFS, p = 0.58) did not differ significantly between the two groups. The Cox regression analyses showed that CTR value, visceral pleural infiltration, and smoking were independent risk factors for worse OS. Furthermore, tumor recurrence pattern and death patterns between the two groups did not differ significantly.
Conclusions: Sublobectomy could achieve superior perioperative outcomes and equivalent oncological efficacy in comparison with lobectomy in elderly patients (≥ 75 years old) with peripheral solid-dominant and diameter ≤ 2 cm NSCLC.
© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.