Background: There is no consensus on the use of prophylactic intraoperative wound irrigation (pIOWI) for reducing surgical-site infections (SSIs), particularly surgical incisional wounds, and opinions are divided on whether an antibiotic should be mixed with the solution used for incisional wound irrigation. No large, reliable cohort studies or meta-analyses of pIOWI for surgical incisional wounds were found in PubMed or Embase.
Methods: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Insight, Scopus, and Web of Science databases for primary research articles investigating the relevance of pIOWI with antibiotics for SSIs. The initial search was limited to human studies published before January 2022, which were indexed as randomized controlled trials (RCTs); clinical trials; or observational, cross-sectional, or cohort studies. We used R statistical software version 4.1.2 for this meta-analysis.
Results: The odds ratio of the random-effects model was 0.519 [95% confidence interval (CI); 0.311, 0.864, P-value < 0.0117], indicating that the intervention had a statistically significant effect on surgical complications. To examine the heterogeneity of the entire study, we performed statistical analysis (τ2 (tau square) = 0.4175 [0.0732; 2.8178]; τ (tau) = 0.6461 [0.2706; 1.6786]; Higgins' I2 = 64.0% [34.8%; 80.1%]; and H = 1.67 [1.24; 2.24]).
Conclusions: Many studies have shown that inclusion of antibiotics in the irrigation solution significantly lowers the rate of soft-tissue-related SSIs, but those studies contain both heterogeneity and many biases. Further large, prospective RCTs only limited to incisional SSIs and excluding other variables and biases in the field of plastic surgery are needed.
Keywords: Infection; Meta-analysis; Surgical wound infection; Therapeutic irrigation.
Copyright © 2022 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.