Rationale: Project UPLIFT is an evidence-based epilepsy self-management program shown to prevent and treat depression through an 8-session, group telehealth intervention. Since 2012, the program has been disseminated by training community-based providers to deliver UPLIFT to people with epilepsy (PWE). Limited research has described the adoption, implementation, and practice-based maintenance of self-management programs like UPLIFT. We sought to gain a better understanding of this process from trained program adopters.
Methods: A cross-sectional evaluation of adoption and implementation experiences was conducted. An online survey with closed- and open-ended questions was distributed to 120 UPLIFT program adopters to collect information about reasons for being trained and experiences implementing the program. Survey items were developed based on the RE-AIM model to assess program reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. For closed-ended responses, frequencies and cross-tabs were calculated. Open-ended responses were reviewed and grouped by theme.
Results: 41 respondents completed the survey (34% response rate). Respondents were from a variety of organizations including clinical (39%, n = 16), educational/research (17%, n = 7), and Epilepsy Foundation affiliates/chapters (12%, n = 5), among others. The most frequently endorsed reason for training in UPLIFT was an interest in supporting PWE (73%, n = 30). Most respondents rated delivering UPLIFT as very important (49%, n = 20) or important (32%, n = 13) to the organization. Sixty-one percent (n = 25) of respondents reported implementing (implementors) UPLIFT. Of those who had not yet implemented UPLIFT, 50% (n = 8) planned on implementing it at some point. Among program implementors, the most frequently reported implementation facilitators included participant interest (68%, n = 17), training (68%, n = 17), and organizational support (64%, n = 16). Program implementors indicated having program champions (80%, n = 20). The most frequently reported implementation challenge reported was recruitment (72%, n = 18). In open-ended responses, funding was a key theme that would facilitate continued implementation, but 48% (n = 12) responded that did not have access to resources and/or funding to help continue offering UPLIFT. Developing partnerships was recommended to improve the reach and maintenance of the program. Despite challenges, implementors agreed (44%, n = 11) or strongly agreed (36%, n = 9) that UPLIFT was effective in addressing mental health problems among program participants, and 76% (n = 19) plan on continuing to offer UPLIFT.
Conclusion: Implementation surveys increase understanding of program adoption and impact for dissemination trainees. Implementation benefits from program champions, strong partnerships, and sustained funding. Continued refinement of implementation support, such as developing a sustained referral system, maintaining relationships with trainees, supporting evaluation activities, and exploring opportunities for program updates to further enhance adoption, implementation, and maintenance.
Keywords: Depression; Evaluation; Implementation; Intervention; Self-management.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.