Comparing preservation substrates under field conditions for efficient DNA recovery in bone

Int J Legal Med. 2023 Mar;137(2):297-301. doi: 10.1007/s00414-022-02923-w. Epub 2022 Dec 10.

Abstract

Often bones are the only biological material left for the identification of human remains. As situations may occur where samples need to be stored for an extended period without access to cooling, appropriate storage of the bone samples is necessary for maintaining the integrity of DNA for profiling. To simulate DNA preservation under field conditions, pig rib bones were used to evaluate the effects of bone cleaning, buffer composition, storage temperature, and time on DNA recovery from bone samples. Bones were stored in three different buffers: TENT, solid sodium chloride, and ethanol-EDTA, at 20 °C and 35 °C for 10, 20, and 30 days. Bones were subsequently dried and ground to powder. DNA was extracted and quantified. Results show that temperature and storage time have no significant influence on DNA yield. DNA recovery from bones stored in solid sodium chloride or ethanol-EDTA was significantly higher compared to bones stored in TENT, and grinding of bones was facilitated by the extent of dehydration in solid sodium chloride and ethanol-EDTA compared to TENT. Overall, solid sodium chloride was found to be superior over ethanol-EDTA; when it comes to transportation, dry material such as salt eliminates the risk of leaking; it is non-toxic and in contrast to ethanol not classified as dangerous goods. Based on this study's results, we recommend NaCl as a storage substrate for forensic samples in cases where no cooling/freezing conditions are available.

Keywords: Bones; DNA extraction; Missing person identification; Solid NaCl.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • DNA / genetics
  • Edetic Acid
  • Ethanol
  • Humans
  • Preservation, Biological*
  • Sodium Chloride*
  • Swine

Substances

  • Sodium Chloride
  • Edetic Acid
  • DNA
  • Ethanol

Grants and funding