Purpose: To compare the morphologic trueness of provisional and definitive restorations constructed with conventional custom impression techniques to those constructed with intra- and extraoral scanning (IEOS), which can digitally transfer the subgingival morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration.
Materials and methods: Provisional restorations were fabricated on typodonts in which implants were placed. In the conventional method, a customized impression coping was produced by using polymethyl methacrylate resin to transfer the subgingival contour of the provisional restoration. Impressions were taken with silicone impression material, and definitive restorations were made by CAM. The IEOS technique was performed as previously reported. In brief, three individually scanned stereolithography (STL) files were superimposed in CAD software to transfer the morphology of the provisional restoration to the definitive restoration. Definitive restorations were then made by CAM. The provisional and definitive restorations were both scanned by IOS. Scanned data files were superimposed with morphometry software, and the distortions were measured. Student t test was used for statistical analysis.
Results: The subgingival morphologies of definitive restorations prepared by the conventional method showed significant negative distortions compared to definitive restorations prepared by the IEOS technique.
Conclusion: The IEOS technique can more accurately transfer the subgingival contour of provisional restorations to definitive restorations compared to the conventional customized impression coping technique.