Examining the clinical impact of rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based diagnostic testing for bloodstream infections in a national cohort of the Veterans Health Administration

Pharmacotherapy. 2023 Jan;43(1):24-34. doi: 10.1002/phar.2747. Epub 2022 Dec 21.

Abstract

Study objective: Bloodstream infections (BSIs) are a significant cause of mortality. Use of a rapid multiplex polymerase chain reaction-based blood culture identification panel (BCID) may improve antimicrobial utilization and clinical outcomes by shortening the time to appropriate therapy and de-escalating antibiotics among patients on overly broad-spectrum empiric therapy. The effect of BCID on clinical outcomes across varying institutional antimicrobial stewardship program (ASP) practices is unclear. This study evaluated clinical outcomes associated with the "real-world" implementation of BCID in a national health system with varying ASP practices.

Design: National, multicenter, retrospective, pre-post quasi-experimental study of hospitalized patients admitted from 2015 to 2020 to VHA facilities, which introduced the BCID for ≥1 year.

Setting: United States Veterans Health Administration (VHA) hospitals with BCID.

Patients: Hospitalized VHA patients with ≥1 blood culture positive for bacteria featured on the BCID panel.

Intervention: Comparison of outcomes between the pre- and post-BCID implementation groups.

Measurements: Outcomes evaluated included early antimicrobial de-escalation within 48 h, defined as reduction in antimicrobial spectrum scores, time to appropriate therapy, and 30-day mortality.

Main results: A total of 4138 patients (pre-BCID, n = 2100; post-BCID, n = 2038) met the study criteria. Implementation of BCID was associated with significant improvements in early antimicrobial de-escalation (34.6%: pre-BCID vs. 38.1%: post-BCID; p = 0.022), which persisted after adjusting for other covariates (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.02-1.20; p = 0.011). Median time to appropriate therapy was shorter in the post-BCID implementation group relative to the pre-BCID group (9 h: pre-BCID vs. 8 h: post-BCID, respectively, p = 0.005), and a greater percentage of patients received early appropriate antimicrobial therapy within 48 h in the post-BCID implementation group (91.7%: pre-BCID vs. 93.8%: post-BCID; p = 0.008). In the multivariable regression analysis, BCID implementation was significantly associated with a higher likelihood of appropriate therapy within 48 h (aRR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; p = 0.020). There was no difference in 30-day mortality between groups overall (12.6% pre-BCID vs. 11.2% post-BCID; p = 0.211).

Conclusions: In a "real-world" clinical setting, the implementation of BCID was associated with clinical improvements in antimicrobial utilization. The BCID platform may serve as a useful adjunct for BSI management in facilities with ASP.

Keywords: BioFire; antimicrobial stewardship; antimicrobial stewardship program; blood culture identification; bloodstream infection; multiplex PCR; rapid molecular diagnostic testing.

Publication types

  • Multicenter Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents / therapeutic use
  • Anti-Infective Agents* / therapeutic use
  • Bacteremia* / diagnosis
  • Bacteremia* / drug therapy
  • Bacteremia* / microbiology
  • Blood Culture
  • Humans
  • Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sepsis* / drug therapy
  • Veterans Health

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Anti-Infective Agents