Reliability of electroencephalogram indicator and event related potential in subacute stroke

Abstract

Cognitive impairment is observed in 12% to 56% of stroke patients, and screening for cognitive impairment is often complex and time-consuming, with results dependent on patient compliance. Therefore, there is a need for an objective method to assess cognitive impairment regardless of patient compliance. Objective evaluation methods include electroencephalogram (EEG) and event-related potential (ERP). This study was conducted to assess intra-tester reliability of resting EEG-based spectral features and auditory/visual P300 latency/amplitude in patients with subacute ischemic stroke. Twenty patients with subacute ischemic stroke were included in the study. The resting EEG and P300 wave using an auditory and visual oddball paradigm were measured at baseline and once again in 24 hours. The following electrode positions (10-20 system) were constantly recorded: F3 (Frontal), Fz, F4, C3 (Central), Cz, C4, P3 (Parietal), Pz, P4. DAR (delta/alpha ratio) and BSI (brain symmetry index) were determined using EEG data. F3 and F4, C3 and C4 and P3 and P4 were switched according to the stroke side and classified as affected hemisphere (AH) and unaffected hemisphere (UH) after the evaluation. In ERP, the amplitude and latency of P300 were obtained. In reliability analysis of EEG-based spectral characteristics, significant reliability was observed for DAR (ICC = 0.447), BSldir (ICC = 0.713) and BSIdirtheta (ICC = 0.724) (Table 4). DAR was showed a poor ICC level, and BSIdir and BSIdirtheta had a moderate ICC level. Visual P300 latency showed excellent intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) in several montages (PUH = 0.972, Pz = 0.945). In 6 montages, auditory P300 latency was reliable, while in 9 montages, visual P300 latency was reliable. In 4 montages, auditory P300 amplitude was reliable, while visual P300 amplitude was reliable in 7. The visual P300 was more reliable than the auditory P300. The ICC values for P300 latency were greater than those for amplitude. Therefore, when ERP is performed on subacute stroke patients, visual has higher reliability than auditory.