Background: High tibial osteotomy (HTO) and medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (mUKA) are accepted treatment for medial knee osteoarthritis (OA). Patients often present meeting indications for both procedures. The purpose of this study was to compare results after MOWHTO and UKA in a matched population of patients older than 50 years.
Method: A retrospective analysis searching for patients older than 50 years meeting indication both for UKA and MOWHTO was performed. A propensity score matching (PSM) based on demographics and clinical data was performed. Tegner activity scale (TAS), Lysholm knee score (LKS) and numeric rating scale for pain (NRS) were recorded prospectively prior to surgery, at 6 months and after a minimum of 4 years.
Results: 64 UKA and 71 MOWHTO were found. Mean follow up was similar (54,05 ± 4,80 and 52,62 ± 3,91). A significant improvement was found in both groups for all outcomes at 6 months and at final follow up. PSM yielded 29 pairs. Patients treated with MOWHTO showed superior TAS scores at 6 months (3,41 ± 0,50 vs 3,10 ± 0,56; p < 0,05) and at final follow up (3,83 ± 0,80 vs 3,27 ± 0,59; p < 0,005). NRS and LKS were comparable between groups.
Conclusions: MOWHTO performed using an open wedge technique, with locking plate and a fast rehabilitation protocol guaranteed higher level of activity than UKA in patients older than 50 years. Difference is significant already at 6 months and last longer than 4 years.
Level of evidence: III.
Keywords: High tibial osteotomy; Knee; Medial Osteoarthritis; Unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.
Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.