Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the current literature on diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) of imaging modalities for adults with acute pulmonary embolism (APE).
Background: Medical imaging plays an integral role in evaluating and managing those with APE. Guidance for imaging modality use for APE diagnosis varies due to a lack of clinical standardisation. Despite this, CTPA remains the first-line imaging modality used by clinicians.
Methods: A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, Trove and Mednar databases (2012-2020; English language) was performed. Studies assessing the DTA of imaging modalities for APE diagnosis were included. DTA studies methodological quality was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2 tool). Results of eligible studies were pooled using random or fixed effects modelling the calculate the pooled DTA of explored imaging modalities for APE. The Higgins I2 test were performed to assess between study heterogeneity.
Results: 10 Studies, involving 998 participants, were enrolled and pooled using the random effects model. Of the explored modalities, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), specifically pulmonary MRI and magnetic resonance pulmonary angiography (MRPA) exhibited the highest pooled DTA. Sensitivity, specificity, negative likelihood ratio, positive likelihood ratio and diagnostic odds ratio for MRPA were 0.952 (95% CI, 0.881 to 0.987), 0.857 (95% CI, 0.637 to 0.97), 5.631 (95% CI, 2.163 to 14.659), 0.06 (95% CI, 0.007 to 0.537) and 80.310 (95% CI, 15.607 to 413.25) respectively. Based on the QUADAS-2 criteria, most studies presented low to moderate risk of bias and concern regarding applicability.
Conclusion: The explored ultrasound and MRI protocols which exhibit a lower radiation burden when compared to the current gold standard computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA), have acceptable diagnostic accuracy for APE and can be useful in certain situations.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.