Emotional and cognitive changes surrounding online depression identity claims

PLoS One. 2022 Dec 1;17(12):e0278179. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0278179. eCollection 2022.

Abstract

As social media has proliferated, a key aspect to making meaningful connections with people online has been revealing important parts of one's identity. In this work, we study changes that occur in people's language use after they share a specific piece of their identity: a depression diagnosis. To do so, we collect data from over five thousand users who have made such a statement, which we refer to as an identity claim. Prior to making a depression identity claim, the Reddit user's language displays evidence of increasingly higher rates of anxiety, sadness, and cognitive processing language compared to matched controls. After the identity claim, these language markers decrease and more closely match the controls. Similarly, first person singular pronoun usage decreases following the identity claim, which was previously previously found to be indicative of self-focus and associated with depression. By further considering how and to whom people express their identity, we find that the observed longitudinal changes are larger for those who do so in ways that are more correlated with seeking help (sharing in a post instead of a comment; sharing in a mental health support forum). This work suggests that there may be benefits to sharing one's depression diagnosis, especially in a semi-anonymous forum where others are likely to be empathetic.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Anxiety
  • Cognition
  • Depression*
  • Emotions*
  • Humans
  • Sadness

Grants and funding

This work was made possible by funding support from the University of Michigan Eisenberg Family Depression Center for LB and RM. RM has also been funded by the Templeton Foundation (#62256). JP has been funded, in part, by the Templeton Foundation (#62256), National Science Foundation (SES1758835), the National Institutes for Health (1R01MH117172), and the Department of Justice (15F06718R0006603), none of which played any role in study design, data collection or interpretation, or in the writing of the report.