Variability of green infrastructure performance due to climatic regimes across Sweden

J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 15;326(Pt B):116354. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116354. Epub 2022 Nov 23.

Abstract

In the context of increasing urbanization and global warming, there is a growing interest in the implementation of green infrastructure (GI) across different climates and regions. Identifying an appropriate GI design criteria is essential to ensure that the design is tailored to satisfy local environmental requirements. This article aims to compare the hydrological performance of GI facilities in eleven Swedish cities by isolating the effect of climatic conditions using an identical GI design configuration. Long-term simulations based on 23-years of meteorological time-series were used as inputs for the Storm Water Management Model (SWMM) with Low Impact Development (LID) controls representing two types of facilities: a biofilter cell (BC) and a green roof. (GR). Large differences in potential annual and seasonal runoff retention were found between locations, driven mainly by the extent of winter/spring season, and the distribution of precipitation patterns (for BCs) and the sequence of rainy days-dry periods and evapotranspiration rates (for GRs). Winter/spring and summer demonstrated the highest/lowest differences between the seasons, results that suggest that implications for design might be aligned to the spatio-temporal distribution of precipitation patterns, and runoff regimes generated by snowmelt and rain-on-snow events, in locations where snowmelt represent high portion of runoff generation.

Keywords: Climate pattern; Design criteria; Freeze-thaw cycles; Hydrological performance; Nature-based solutions; Saturated hydraulic conductivity; Snowmelt modelling.

MeSH terms

  • Hydrology
  • Rain*
  • Seasons
  • Snow / chemistry
  • Sweden
  • Water Movements*