Higher Risk of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and Risk Factors among Patients with COVID-19: A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Nov 16;19(22):15125. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192215125.

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the global risk and risk factors associated with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) among patients with COVID-19: Design: A systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression.

Setting and participants: Hospitals or nursing homes and patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome after COVID-19.

Methods: The literature review was systematically conducted on Embase, MEDLINE, CINAHL, and Web of Science, in addition to manual searches and reference list checking from 1 January 2019 to 2 March 2022. The search terms included coronavirus, acute respiratory syndrome, acute respiratory distress syndrome and observational studies. Three reviewers independently appraised the quality of the studies and extracted the relevant data using the Joanna Briggs Institute abstraction form and critical appraisal tools. A study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42022311957). Eligible studies were meta-analyzed and underwent meta-regression.

Results: A total of 12 studies were included, with 148,080 participants. The risk ratio (RR) of ARDS was 23%. Risk factors were age ≥ 41-64 years old (RR = 15.3%, 95% CI =0.14-2.92, p = 0.03); fever (RR = 10.3%, 95% CI = 0.03-2.03, p = 0.04); multilobe involvement of the chest (RR = 33.5%, 95% CI = 0.35-6.36, p = 0.02); lymphopenia (RR = 25.9%, 95% CI = 1.11-4.08, p = 0.01); mechanical ventilation with oxygen therapy (RR = 31.7%, 95% CI = 1.10-5.25, p = 0.002); European region (RR = 16.3%, 95% CI = 0.09-3.17, p = 0.03); sample size ≤ 500 (RR = 18.0%, 95% CI = 0.70-2.89, p = 0.001).

Conclusions and implications: One in four patients experienced ARDS after having COVID-19. The age group 41-64 years old and the European region were high-risk groups. These findings can be used by policymakers to allocate resources for respiratory care facilities and can also provide scientific evidence in the design of protocols to manage COVID-19 worldwide.

Keywords: acute respiratory distress syndrome; coronavirus infection; risk factor.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • COVID-19* / epidemiology
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Respiration, Artificial / adverse effects
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome* / epidemiology
  • Respiratory Distress Syndrome* / etiology
  • Respiratory Therapy
  • Risk Factors

Grants and funding

This research was supported by the An Nan Hospital, China Medical University, Tainan, Taiwan (ANHRF109-30). The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the An Nan Hospital. The funding sources did not have any role in the study design, collection, analysis and interpretation of data or in the writing of the manuscript.