Efficacy of natural antimicrobial peptides versus peptidomimetic analogues: a systematic review

Future Med Chem. 2022 Dec;14(24):1899-1921. doi: 10.4155/fmc-2022-0160. Epub 2022 Nov 24.

Abstract

Aims: This systematic review was carried out to determine whether synthetic peptidomimetics exhibit significant advantages over antimicrobial peptides in terms of in vitro potency. Structural features - molecular weight, charge and length - were examined for correlations with activity. Methods: Original research articles reporting minimum inhibitory concentration values against Escherichia coli, indexed until 31 December 2020, were searched in PubMed/ScienceDirect/Google Scholar and evaluated using mixed-effects models. Results: In vitro antimicrobial activity of peptidomimetics resembled that of antimicrobial peptides. Net charge significantly affected minimum inhibitory concentration values (p < 0.001) with a trend of 4.6% decrease for increments in charge by +1. Conclusion: AMPs and antibacterial peptidomimetics exhibit similar potencies, providing an opportunity to exploit the advantageous stability and bioavailability typically associated with peptidomimetics.

Keywords: Gram-negative; antibiotic; antimicrobial resistance; peptides; peptidomimetics.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Review
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents* / chemistry
  • Anti-Bacterial Agents* / pharmacology
  • Antimicrobial Peptides* / chemistry
  • Antimicrobial Peptides* / pharmacology
  • Escherichia coli
  • Microbial Sensitivity Tests
  • Peptidomimetics* / chemistry
  • Peptidomimetics* / pharmacology

Substances

  • Anti-Bacterial Agents
  • Antimicrobial Peptides
  • Peptidomimetics