Conservation ethics in the time of the pandemic: Does increasing remote access advance social justice?

Abraham J Miller-Rushing; Elizabeth R Ellwood; Theresa M Crimmins; Amanda S Gallinat; Molly Phillips; Ronald L Sandler; Richard B Primack

doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109788

Conservation ethics in the time of the pandemic: Does increasing remote access advance social justice?

Biol Conserv. 2022 Dec:276:109788. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2022.109788. Epub 2022 Nov 8.

Authors

Abraham J Miller-Rushing¹, Elizabeth R Ellwood^{2

3}, Theresa M Crimmins⁴, Amanda S Gallinat⁵, Molly Phillips², Ronald L Sandler⁶, Richard B Primack⁷

Affiliations

¹ US National Park Service, Acadia National Park, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
² iDigBio, Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
³ Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
⁴ USA National Phenology Network, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA.
⁵ Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
⁶ Department of Philosophy and Religion, Northeastern University, Boston, MA, USA.
⁷ Department of Biology, Boston University, Boston, MA, USA.

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic is stimulating improvements in remote access and use of technology in conservation-related programs and research. In many cases, organizations have intended for remote engagement to benefit groups that have been marginalized in the sciences. But are they? It is important to consider how remote access affects social justice in conservation biology-i.e., the principle that all people should be equally respected and valued in conservation organizations, programs, projects, and practices. To support such consideration, we describe a typology of justice-oriented principles that can be used to examine social justice in a range of conservation activities. We apply this typology to three conservation areas: (1) remote access to US national park educational programs and data; (2) digitization of natural history specimens and their use in conservation research; and (3) remote engagement in conservation-oriented citizen science. We then address the questions: Which justice-oriented principles are salient in which conservation contexts or activities? How can those principles be best realized in those contexts or activities? In each of the three areas we examined, remote access increased participation, but access and benefits were not equally distributed and unanticipated consequences have not been adequately addressed. We identify steps that can and are being taken to advance social justice in conservation, such as assessing programs to determine if they are achieving their stated social justice-oriented aims and revising initiatives as needed. The framework that we present could be used to assess the social justice dimensions of many conservation programs, institutions, practices, and policies.

Keywords: Citizen science; Digitization; Museum specimens; National parks; Remote access; Social justice.