Rural health in the Progressive Era: revisiting the hookworm intervention in the American South

Jonathan F Fox; Theocharis N Grigoriadis

doi:10.2185/jrm.2021-061

Rural health in the Progressive Era: revisiting the hookworm intervention in the American South

J Rural Med. 2022 Oct;17(4):236-247. doi: 10.2185/jrm.2021-061. Epub 2022 Oct 22.

Authors

Jonathan F Fox¹, Theocharis N Grigoriadis^{2

3}

Affiliations

¹ JFK Institute of North American Studies, School of Business & Economics, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
² Institute of East European Studies, School of Business & Economics, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany.
³ Istanbul Policy Center, Sabancı University, Turkey.

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we investigated Progressive Era public health interventions and connected two subsequent efforts to improve outcomes in the American South: the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission's hookworm eradication efforts in the early 1910s and investments in local health infrastructure between the 1910s and the 1930s. We tested whether hookworm eradication had the largest effects in areas that invested in public health and whether county health organizations-cooperative public-private institutional arrangements-impacted the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission program's success. Materials and Methods: The methods used to measure the effects involved estimation of difference-in-difference and triple-difference models across the geographic samples of the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission's surveyed area, the American South, and the United States. Material on hookworm infection rates and activities by the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission is obtained from the Rockefeller Foundation Annual Reports. Material on the activities, spending, and duration of the different county health organizations is obtained from the Public Health Service Bulletin 222 titled, "A history of county health organizations in the United States: 1908-1933". Results: By comparing similar cooperative and independent county health organizations in the American South with the rest of the United States, we find that cooperative efforts are generally important and strengthen the Rockefeller Sanitary Commission's impact on human capital outcomes in the American South. Simultaneously, independent county health organizations produced negative or non-significant effects. Conclusion: The Rockefeller Sanitary Commission is important in guiding local health efforts. Our results are robust in both the short and long runs. This study sheds light on the effectiveness of public-private partnerships in rural public health during the Progressive Era.

Keywords: county health organizations; hookworm eradication; progressive era; public-private partnerships.