Purpose: To compare the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy plus regorafenib versus regorafenib only in patients with pretreated hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods: Immunotherapy plus regorafenib or regorafenib alone was analyzed in patients with advanced HCC with documented tumor progression on front-line therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed.
Results: Of the 125 patients enrolled in this study, 50 patients received combination (pCOM) treatment as front-line treatment, and 60 patients received monotherapy (pMONO) as front-line treatment. In the pCOM cohort, median OS was significantly longer with for patients regorafenib plus immunotherapy than regorafenib alone treatment (15.0 vs. 2.0 months; P = 0.035). The DCR numerically increased in the regorafenib plus immunotherapy treatment in both cohorts (40.6 % vs. 22.2 %, 72.7 % vs. 54.7 %, respectively). There were no differences in PFS with regorafenib according to whether or not regorafenib was combined with immunotherapy in the pCOM and pMONO cohorts (PFS, P = 0.17, P = 0.91, respectively). Regarding the number of TRAEs occurred, regorafenib plus immunotherapy group was comparable to regorafenib group in the pCOM cohort (65.6 % vs. 72.2 %). In the pMONO cohort, TRAEs occurred in fewer patients receiving regorafenib than regorafenib plus immunotherapy (69.8 % vs. 95.5 %).
Conclusions: Immunotherapy plus regorafenib may significantly improve clinical outcomes and have a manageable safety profile compared with regorafenib monotherapy in advanced HCC after front-line therapy failure. The efficacy of combination therapy needs to be validated in prospective studies with large samples.
Keywords: Combination therapy; Immunotherapy; NLR; PLR; Refractory hepatocellular carcinoma; Second-line treatment.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.