Should mild obstructive sleep apnoea be treated? A systematic review from the standpoint of disease progression

J Laryngol Otol. 2023 Aug;137(8):828-839. doi: 10.1017/S0022215122002419. Epub 2022 Nov 16.

Abstract

Objective: This study was a systematic review to investigate the progression of untreated obstructive sleep apnoea in order to evaluate whether mild obstructive sleep apnoea should be treated from the standpoint of disease progression.

Method: The database search study outcomes that were collected included Apnea Hypopnea Index and Respiratory Disturbance Index. A meta-analysis of obstructive sleep apnoea severity over time intervals was performed.

Results: A total of 17 longitudinal studies and 1 randomised, controlled trial were included for review. For patients with mild obstructive sleep apnoea, mean pre-study and post-study Apnea Hypopnea Index was 5.21 and 8.03, respectively, over a median interval of 53.1 months. In patients with moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnoea, mean pre-study and post-study Apnea Hypopnea Index was 28.9 and 30.3, respectively, over a median interval of 57.8 months. Predictors for disease progression in mild obstructive sleep apnoea are patients aged less than 60 years and those with a baseline body mass index less than 25.

Conclusion: Mild obstructive sleep apnoea progression is observed, but it does not appear to reach any clinically significant progression to moderate or severe obstructive sleep apnoea.

Keywords: Body Mass Index; Sleep Apnea, Obstructive; Sleep Disordered Breathing; Snoring.

Publication types

  • Systematic Review
  • Meta-Analysis
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Body Mass Index
  • Disease Progression
  • Humans
  • Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
  • Sleep Apnea, Obstructive* / therapy