Objective: The aim: To assess the actual prevalence of rubber dam usage among general dentists.
Patients and methods: Materials and methods: Surveyed participants were offered a questionnaire containing 14 questions about gender, country of origin, clinical experience, time and place of acquisition of skills of rubber dam, as well as the frequency of its usage.
Results: Results: 30.69% of dentists always use rubber dams for direct restorations; 74.26% always use rubber dams during root canals treatment; 36.3% always use rubber dam for bonding indirect restorations.
Conclusion: Conclusions: The prevalence of rubber usage among general dentists shows positive growth dynamics, but the frequency is still considered insufficient.
Keywords: dental general practice; dental research; rubber dams; school dentistry; endodontics.