Background: Previous studies on the impact of measurement error for PM2.5 were mostly simulation studies, did not control for other pollutants, or used a single regression calibration model to correct for measurement error. However, the relationship between actual and error-prone PM2.5 concentration may vary by time and region. We aim to correct the measurement error of PM2.5 predictions using stratified regression calibration and investigate how the measurement error biases the association between PM2.5 and mortality in the Medicare Cohort.
Methods: The "gold-standard" measurements of PM2.5 were defined as daily monitoring data. We regressed daily monitoring PM2.5 on modeled PM2.5 using the simple linear regression by strata of season, elevation, census division and time period. Calibrated PM2.5 was calculated with stratum-specific calibration parameters β0 (intercept) and β1 (slope) for each strata and aggregated to annual level. Associations between calibrated and error-prone annual PM2.5 and all-cause mortality among Medicare beneficiaries were estimated with Quasi-Poisson regression models.
Results: Across 208 strata, the median of β0 and β1 were 0.62 (25% 0.0.20, 75% 1.06) and 0.93 (25% 0.87, 75% 0.99). From calibrated and error-prone PM2.5 data, we estimated that each 10 μg/m3 increase in PM2.5 was respectively associated with 4.9% (95%CI 4.6-5.2) and 4.6% (95%CI 4.4-4.9) increases in the mortality rate among Medicare beneficiaries, conditional on confounders.
Conclusions: Regression calibration parameters of PM2.5 varied by time and region. Using error-prone measures of PM2.5 underestimated the association between PM2.5 and all-cause mortality. Modern exposure models produce relatively small bias.
Keywords: Air pollution; Measurement error; Mortality; PM(2.5); Regression calibration.
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.