A 22-Site Comparison of Land-Use Practices, E-coli and Enterococci Concentrations

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 26;19(21):13907. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113907.

Abstract

Land-use practices can greatly impact water quality. Escherichia (E.) coli and Enterococcus are accepted water quality indicators. However, surprisingly little research has been conducted comparing both organisms' population density relationships to land use practices and water quality. Stream water grab samples were collected monthly (n = 9 months) from 22 stream monitoring sites draining varying land use practice types in a representative mixed-land-use watershed of the northeastern United States. E. coli and enterococci colony forming units (CFU per 100 mL) were estimated (n = 396) and statistically analyzed relative to land use practices, hydroclimate, and pH, using a suite of methods, including correlation analysis, Principal Components Analysis (PCA), and Canonical Correspondence Analysis (CCA). Correlation analyses indicated significant (p < 0.05) relationships between fecal indicator bacteria concentrations, water quality metrics and land use practices but emphasized significant (p < 0.05) negative correlations between pH and instream enterococci concentrations. PCA and CCA results indicated consistent spatial differences between fecal indicator bacteria concentrations, pH, and land use/land cover characteristics. The study showed that pH could be considered an integrated proxy variable for past (legacy) and present land use practice influences. Results also bring to question the comparability of E-coli and enterococci relative to dominant land use practices and variations in pH and provide useful information that will help guide land use practice and water pollutant mitigation decision making.

Keywords: Escherichia coli; acid-mine drainage; enterococcus; fecal indicators; land use practices; water quality.

Publication types

  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.

MeSH terms

  • Bacteria
  • Enterococcus*
  • Environmental Monitoring / methods
  • Escherichia coli*
  • Feces / microbiology
  • Rivers / microbiology
  • Water Microbiology

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation under Award Number OIA-1458952, the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Wetland Program Development Grant, Project Number: EPA-R3-WPDG-18-19, the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project accession number 1011536, McIntire Stennis accession number 7003934, and the WV Agricultural and Forestry Experiment Station. Results presented may not reflect the views of the sponsors and no official endorsement should be inferred. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.