Reply to: Existing methods are effective at measuring natural selection on gene expression
Nat Ecol Evol
.
2022 Dec;6(12):1838-1839.
doi: 10.1038/s41559-022-01916-7.
Epub 2022 Nov 7.
Authors
Peter D Price
1
,
Daniela H Palmer Droguett
2
3
,
Jessica A Taylor
2
,
Dong W Kim
4
,
Elsie S Place
5
,
Thea F Rogers
2
,
Judith E Mank
6
7
8
,
Christopher R Cooney
2
,
Alison E Wright
9
Affiliations
1
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. pprice3@sheffield.ac.uk.
2
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
3
Ecology, Evolution, and Behavior Program, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
4
Solomon H. Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
5
Development, Regeneration and Neurophysiology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
6
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
7
Beaty Biodiversity Research Centre, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.
8
Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, UK.
9
Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, School of Biosciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK. a.e.wright@sheffield.ac.uk.
PMID:
36344678
DOI:
10.1038/s41559-022-01916-7
No abstract available
Publication types
Letter
Comment
MeSH terms
Gene Expression
Selection, Genetic*