Prostate Cancer: Update on Grading and Reporting

Surg Pathol Clin. 2022 Dec;15(4):579-589. doi: 10.1016/j.path.2022.07.008. Epub 2022 Oct 13.

Abstract

The Gleason scoring system and Grade Group systems facilitate accurate grading and reporting of prostate cancer, which are essential tasks for surgical pathologists. Gleason Pattern 4 is critical to recognize because it signifies a risk for more aggressive behavior than Gleason Pattern 3 carcinoma. Prostatic adenocarcinoma with radiation or androgen therapy effect, with aberrant P63 expression, or with Paneth cell-like differentiation represent pitfalls in prostate cancer grading because although they display architecture associated with aggressive behavior in usual prostatic adenocarcinoma, they do not behave aggressively and using conventional Gleason scoring in these tumors would significantly overstate their biologic potential.

Keywords: Gleason scoring; Grade groups; Intraductal carcinoma; Prostate cancer; Prostatic adenocarcinoma with Paneth cell–like differentiation; Prostatic adenocarcinoma with aberrant P63 expression.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adenocarcinoma* / diagnosis
  • Adenocarcinoma* / pathology
  • Carcinoma* / pathology
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Neoplasm Grading
  • Pathologists
  • Prostatic Neoplasms* / diagnosis
  • Prostatic Neoplasms* / pathology